Re: [-empyre-] point of reference
- To: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Subject: Re: [-empyre-] point of reference
- From: Chris Ashley <chrisashley@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: empyre@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=3w3eFyBR8DXQHVUzR+Xy41sOFEeO1Iw7dwoZ+MUlsjBsPUTpVN+WdJ60BTsI/GMsr2rPW3pwZOTBFBXf8jZGpQnuzh9bUtGsyRRj4j7S7y5LrP/Kzw3Yo1M8dfAdHp75kzBlHvgCqukdX6oNJ0MbCIW/intMPEOSTVKxRc1o9q0= ;
- In-reply-to: <ff743e3e0506061117182bee0c@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
--- marcus bastos <bastos.marcus@gmail.com> wrote:
> wondering: doesn´t this back and forth movement from
> empyre to blogs
> signal that the web is no longer a network of fixed
> places, but rather
> a bunch of nods that people keep sowing without even
> caring that much
> about eventual central points?
I'm grappling with what seems like a general
statement- "people keep sowing without even caring
that much"- which people, and who doesn't care? If
you look at the work of the four panelists and the
places that each hae made for himself I'd say there is
a lot of care there. If you're referring to some
users who start up or join web sites, mailing lists,
and weblogs and abandond them, well, I wonder if that
has more to do with misconceived ideas about the work
and involvement in those ventures rather than whether
or not they really care.
> Can´t this be also
> related to the very
> idea of self and self-centering?
Say more. What's the distinction is being made here
between self and self-centering? Is self a kind of
consciousness, and self-centering a kind of
unconsciousness. Am I confusing the negative term
"self-centered" with "self-centering?"
Chris
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.